- Brandi Levy is suing the Mahanoy Faculty District in Pennsylvania, claiming that her proper to free speech has been violated.
- Levy was suspended by the cheerleading group after posting a Snapchat about not being on the varsity group.
“F — college, f — softball, f — cheer, f — every part,” she wrote.
- Visit the Insider homepage for more stories.
The Supreme Court docket this week will hear the pleadings in a case involving a former highschool cheerleader being punished for a secular rant on Snapchat – and it may result in a landmark ruling on the bounds of free speech.
Brandi Levy was a 14-year-old ninth scholar when she missed out on the varsity cheerleading group at Pennsylvania’s Mahanoy Space Excessive Faculty in 2017.
In an offended rant, she posted a photograph on Snapchat, displaying it to her and a pal with the center finger raised and the caption, “F — college, f — softball, f — cheer, f — all, ” according to the American Civil Liberties Union.
The picture was despatched to 250 pals earlier than being routinely deleted 24 hours later. However one individual took a screenshot from Snapchat and confirmed it to a lady from one of many cheerleading trainers.
In response, coaches suspected Levy of the group for a yr, claiming his Snapchat violated a group rule of avoiding “unhealthy language and inappropriate gestures” and “adverse data concerning cheerleading, pom – cheerleaders or coaches positioned on the Web “. according to the Washington Post.
Levy stated the Snapchat submit was taken off campus at a comfort retailer. She and her mother and father sued the varsity district with the help of the ACLU, accusing college officers of violating her First Modification proper to free speech.
A district choose agreed the suspension violated the First Modification and ordered Levy reinstated within the cheerleading squad – she was a sophomore on the varsity group and was part of the varsity junior group and senior.
In complete, the judges dominated in favor of Levy in two lower federal courts and one appeals court.
However the Supreme Court docket will hear enchantment arguments from the Mahanoy area college district on Wednesday.
Beneath a 1969 Supreme Court docket ruling, public colleges can punish college students for speech that might “considerably disrupt” the varsity group, however the precedent doesn’t apply to off-campus speech. The Supreme Court docket’s choice may have an effect on this precedent.
“I really feel that college students must be protected and be capable of converse out with none type of punishment from the varsity,” stated Levy, now an 18-year-old scholar. told Reuters. “It is going to present everybody that it’s okay for individuals to precise their emotions outdoors of faculty.”
The Supreme Court docket is because of hear the case on Wednesday, Mahanoy Region School District v. BL, and render a choice this summer time.